New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: PySwarms: a research toolkit for Particle Swarm Optimization in Python #428

Closed
whedon opened this Issue Oct 9, 2017 · 16 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
6 participants
@whedon
Collaborator

whedon commented Oct 9, 2017

Submitting author: @ljvmiranda921 (Lester James Miranda)
Repository: https://github.com/ljvmiranda921/pyswarms
Version: v0.1.7
Editor: @kyleniemeyer
Reviewer: @stsievert

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ljvmiranda921. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@ljvmiranda921 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Oct 9, 2017

Collaborator

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. @kyleniemeyer it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
Collaborator

whedon commented Oct 9, 2017

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. @kyleniemeyer it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
@arfon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arfon

arfon Oct 9, 2017

Member

👋 @kyleniemeyer - the submitting author suggested you as an editor.

Member

arfon commented Oct 9, 2017

👋 @kyleniemeyer - the submitting author suggested you as an editor.

@kyleniemeyer

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kyleniemeyer

kyleniemeyer Oct 13, 2017

Collaborator

@arfon OK, got it.

@ljvmiranda921 I will work on identifying appropriate reviewer(s); any suggestions you have for people with domain knowledge are also appreciated.

Collaborator

kyleniemeyer commented Oct 13, 2017

@arfon OK, got it.

@ljvmiranda921 I will work on identifying appropriate reviewer(s); any suggestions you have for people with domain knowledge are also appreciated.

@ljvmiranda921

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ljvmiranda921

ljvmiranda921 Oct 14, 2017

Collaborator

Hi @kyleniemeyer , thank you for taking the time to oversee the review of this submission.

I checked the list of reviewers for JOSS, then looked for keywords such as "optimization" and "python". I think that @stsievert and @oesteban may be suitable to review this if they have the time.

Thank you so much!

Collaborator

ljvmiranda921 commented Oct 14, 2017

Hi @kyleniemeyer , thank you for taking the time to oversee the review of this submission.

I checked the list of reviewers for JOSS, then looked for keywords such as "optimization" and "python". I think that @stsievert and @oesteban may be suitable to review this if they have the time.

Thank you so much!

@oesteban

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@oesteban

oesteban Oct 17, 2017

Collaborator

@kyleniemeyer @ljvmiranda921
I'd love reviewing this submission, but I'm pretty swamped right now. I could commit to get the review done in 3/4 weeks from now.

Collaborator

oesteban commented Oct 17, 2017

@kyleniemeyer @ljvmiranda921
I'd love reviewing this submission, but I'm pretty swamped right now. I could commit to get the review done in 3/4 weeks from now.

@stsievert

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@stsievert

stsievert Oct 17, 2017

Collaborator

Ditto. Give me another two weeks.

@ljvmiranda921 hyperopt and the accompanying paper might be of interest for the hyper-parameter optimization. Also, dask-searchcv might be of interest.

Collaborator

stsievert commented Oct 17, 2017

Ditto. Give me another two weeks.

@ljvmiranda921 hyperopt and the accompanying paper might be of interest for the hyper-parameter optimization. Also, dask-searchcv might be of interest.

@ljvmiranda921

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ljvmiranda921

ljvmiranda921 Oct 17, 2017

Collaborator

Sure, thanks for accepting to review @oesteban , @stsievert . I'd be waiting for your review at the time you've mentioned.

Okay, in the meantime I will check on the hyperparameter optimization libraries stsievert mentioned. It may be useful to add an adapter to one of those libraries in pyswarms.

Thanks a lot!

cc: @kyleniemeyer

Collaborator

ljvmiranda921 commented Oct 17, 2017

Sure, thanks for accepting to review @oesteban , @stsievert . I'd be waiting for your review at the time you've mentioned.

Okay, in the meantime I will check on the hyperparameter optimization libraries stsievert mentioned. It may be useful to add an adapter to one of those libraries in pyswarms.

Thanks a lot!

cc: @kyleniemeyer

@kyleniemeyer

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kyleniemeyer

kyleniemeyer Oct 18, 2017

Collaborator

Hi @stsievert and @oesteban, thanks for agreeing to review! (Hopefully that's what you meant with those messages 😄). I'll get the actual review issue started, with @stsievert set as the "main" reviewer since he expects to get to it a bit sooner—but both of you can add comments. (JOSS currently only supports one official reviewer, though we hope to fix that soon.)

@ljvmiranda921 I appreciate your effort finding reviewers, but I will shepherd the review... less appropriate for the submitting author to do so 😆

Collaborator

kyleniemeyer commented Oct 18, 2017

Hi @stsievert and @oesteban, thanks for agreeing to review! (Hopefully that's what you meant with those messages 😄). I'll get the actual review issue started, with @stsievert set as the "main" reviewer since he expects to get to it a bit sooner—but both of you can add comments. (JOSS currently only supports one official reviewer, though we hope to fix that soon.)

@ljvmiranda921 I appreciate your effort finding reviewers, but I will shepherd the review... less appropriate for the submitting author to do so 😆

@kyleniemeyer

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kyleniemeyer

kyleniemeyer Oct 18, 2017

Collaborator

@whedon assign @stsievert as reviewer

Collaborator

kyleniemeyer commented Oct 18, 2017

@whedon assign @stsievert as reviewer

@whedon whedon assigned kyleniemeyer and unassigned kyleniemeyer Oct 18, 2017

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Oct 18, 2017

Collaborator

OK, the reviewer is @stsievert

Collaborator

whedon commented Oct 18, 2017

OK, the reviewer is @stsievert

@kyleniemeyer

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kyleniemeyer

kyleniemeyer Oct 18, 2017

Collaborator

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

Collaborator

kyleniemeyer commented Oct 18, 2017

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Oct 18, 2017

Collaborator

OK, I've started the review over in #433. Feel free to close this issue now!

Collaborator

whedon commented Oct 18, 2017

OK, I've started the review over in #433. Feel free to close this issue now!

@kyleniemeyer

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kyleniemeyer

kyleniemeyer Oct 18, 2017

Collaborator

@stsievert @oesteban we'll hold the actual review over in #433

Collaborator

kyleniemeyer commented Oct 18, 2017

@stsievert @oesteban we'll hold the actual review over in #433

@ljvmiranda921

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ljvmiranda921

ljvmiranda921 Oct 19, 2017

Collaborator

Oops, sorry @kyleniemeyer 😓

Collaborator

ljvmiranda921 commented Oct 19, 2017

Oops, sorry @kyleniemeyer 😓

@kyleniemeyer

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kyleniemeyer

kyleniemeyer Oct 19, 2017

Collaborator

@ljvmiranda921 no worries!

Collaborator

kyleniemeyer commented Oct 19, 2017

@ljvmiranda921 no worries!

@stsievert

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@stsievert

stsievert Oct 19, 2017

Collaborator

Hopefully that's what you meant with those messages

Yup, that's what I meant (but can't get to it right away).

(JOSS currently only supports one official reviewer, though we hope to fix that soon.)

I also ran into this in #382. Hopefully it's fixed soon!

Collaborator

stsievert commented Oct 19, 2017

Hopefully that's what you meant with those messages

Yup, that's what I meant (but can't get to it right away).

(JOSS currently only supports one official reviewer, though we hope to fix that soon.)

I also ran into this in #382. Hopefully it's fixed soon!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment