New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: simpleCache: R caching for reproducible, distributed, large-scale projects #447

Closed
whedon opened this Issue Nov 2, 2017 · 16 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@whedon
Collaborator

whedon commented Nov 2, 2017

Submitting author: @vpnagraj (VP Nagraj)
Repository: https://github.com/databio/simpleCache
Version: 0.3.1
Editor: @leeper
Reviewer: @sckott

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @vpnagraj. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@vpnagraj if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

@whedon whedon added the pre-review label Nov 2, 2017

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Nov 2, 2017

Collaborator

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
Collaborator

whedon commented Nov 2, 2017

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Nov 12, 2017

Member

@HenrikBengtsson would you be interested in reviewing this for JOSS?

Member

leeper commented Nov 12, 2017

@HenrikBengtsson would you be interested in reviewing this for JOSS?

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Nov 12, 2017

Member

@whedon assign @leeper as editor

Member

leeper commented Nov 12, 2017

@whedon assign @leeper as editor

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Nov 12, 2017

Collaborator

OK, the editor is @leeper

Collaborator

whedon commented Nov 12, 2017

OK, the editor is @leeper

@HenrikBengtsson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@HenrikBengtsson

HenrikBengtsson Nov 14, 2017

@leeper, it looks interesting but unfortunately I'm too busy right now.

HenrikBengtsson commented Nov 14, 2017

@leeper, it looks interesting but unfortunately I'm too busy right now.

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Nov 16, 2017

Member

No problem, @HenrikBengtsson. Thanks for getting back to me.

Member

leeper commented Nov 16, 2017

No problem, @HenrikBengtsson. Thanks for getting back to me.

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Nov 16, 2017

Member

@sckott would you be interested in reviewing this for JOSS?

Member

leeper commented Nov 16, 2017

@sckott would you be interested in reviewing this for JOSS?

@sckott

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sckott

sckott Nov 16, 2017

Member

@leeper sure thing

Member

sckott commented Nov 16, 2017

@leeper sure thing

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Nov 16, 2017

Member

@whedon set @sckott as reviewer

Member

leeper commented Nov 16, 2017

@whedon set @sckott as reviewer

@arfon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arfon

arfon Nov 16, 2017

Member

@whedon set @sckott as reviewer

@leeper - there's a slight inconsistency for Whedon here. You need @whedon assign @sckott as reviewer

Member

arfon commented Nov 16, 2017

@whedon set @sckott as reviewer

@leeper - there's a slight inconsistency for Whedon here. You need @whedon assign @sckott as reviewer

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Nov 16, 2017

Member

@whedon assign @sckott as reviewer

Member

leeper commented Nov 16, 2017

@whedon assign @sckott as reviewer

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Nov 16, 2017

Collaborator

OK, the reviewer is @sckott

Collaborator

whedon commented Nov 16, 2017

OK, the reviewer is @sckott

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Nov 16, 2017

Member

@arfon :d'oh reaction emoji:

Member

leeper commented Nov 16, 2017

@arfon :d'oh reaction emoji:

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Nov 16, 2017

Member

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

Member

leeper commented Nov 16, 2017

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@whedon

whedon Nov 16, 2017

Collaborator

OK, I've started the review over in #463. Feel free to close this issue now!

Collaborator

whedon commented Nov 16, 2017

OK, I've started the review over in #463. Feel free to close this issue now!

@leeper

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@leeper

leeper Nov 16, 2017

Member

@sckott Thanks so much! Review is setup over here: #463

Member

leeper commented Nov 16, 2017

@sckott Thanks so much! Review is setup over here: #463

@leeper leeper closed this Nov 16, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment