New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: GrainSizeTools: a Python script for grain size analysis and paleopiezometry based on grain size #811
Comments
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #811 with the following error: /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/find.rb:43:in |
👋 @lheagy - the submitting author suggested you as the handling editor. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #811 with the following error: /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/psych.rb:379:in |
👋 @marcoalopez - this PR should fix the paper compilation issue: marcoalopez/GrainSizeTools#1 |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #811 with the following error: /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/psych.rb:379:in |
@marcoalopez - I think you need to quote your title, i.e. change:
|
@arfon I already fixed the whitespace and the title issues in my repository. I'm not sure how to proceed now or if this is the right thing to do. |
Thanks @marcoalopez we can try rebuilding the pdf to make sure it is now working. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #811 with the following error: /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/psych.rb:379:in |
Looks like you need to change:
to:
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #811 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 |
@marcoalopez - looks like you're missing a comma here: https://github.com/marcoalopez/GrainSizeTools/blob/master/paper.bib#L42 |
@arfon fixed the missing comma. Again, thanks for your patience. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #811 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 |
@marcoalopez - looks like Pandoc can't handle bibtex keys with spaces in them (e.g. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
Thanks @marcoalopez. I have taken a quick look at GrainSizeTools and want to raise a couple things before we get started on the review. The package layout does not follow standard python packaging practices (see for example: https://packaging.python.org/tutorials/packaging-projects/).
This would allow more flexible use - for example if a user wants to install your package through pypi and import it into a Jupyter notebook as a part of their workflow. Is this something you would like to look into before we bring reviewers on board? If not, then I would recommend starting an issue if this is something you plan to do, or if not, then there should be some explanation in the readme about why the code is structured the way it is. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Thanks! |
Hello @lheagy. I was unaware of standard Python packaging practices. My intention is to follow standard Python practices, so I want to follow these guidelines. So for me is ok if you start an issue indicating this. All the best, Marco |
@marcoalopez: do you have any recommendations for reviewers? |
@lheagy: not really since I don't know anyone who works with grain size distributions or paleopiezometry who programs in Python. I know some people who work on similar topics but they program in Matlab. |
@lheagy Sure, I can help with the review. |
Hi @marcoalopez, @khaors: quick update, I have sent an email to @jsta asking if he is willing to review. I will keep you updated |
@lheagy Yes, I can help with this review. |
Excellent, thanks @jsta! |
OK, @jsta is now a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #863. Feel free to close this issue now! |
Submitting author: @marcoalopez (Marco A. Lopez-Sanchez)
Repository: https://github.com/marcoalopez/GrainSizeTools/
Version: v2.0
Editor: @lheagy
Reviewers: @jsta
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @marcoalopez. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.
@marcoalopez if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: