New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added soldier welfare section and Innovation Centres policy #618

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 25, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@BrotherSideways
Contributor

BrotherSideways commented Jul 13, 2017

Funding is available to help soldiers retrain and adjust to civilian life, and many go on to start their own successful businesses. But more could be done to ensure that these businesses are a success. By providing funding in this area we can make sure that skills learned in active service can be utilised fully in civilian life, ensuring that the country gets the full benefit of our military budget and improving quality of life for veterans

@openpolitics-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@openpolitics-bot

openpolitics-bot Jul 13, 2017

Member

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote symbol type this points
Yes :white_check_mark: 1
No :negative_squared_cross_mark: -1
Abstain 🤐 :zipper_mouth_face: 0
Block 🚫 :no_entry_sign: -1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

@BrotherSideways, if you want to make further changes to this proposal, you can do so by clicking on the pencil icons here. If a change is made to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted, and votes must be recast.

Member

openpolitics-bot commented Jul 13, 2017

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote symbol type this points
Yes :white_check_mark: 1
No :negative_squared_cross_mark: -1
Abstain 🤐 :zipper_mouth_face: 0
Block 🚫 :no_entry_sign: -1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

@BrotherSideways, if you want to make further changes to this proposal, you can do so by clicking on the pencil icons here. If a change is made to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted, and votes must be recast.

@Floppy

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Floppy

Floppy Jul 18, 2017

Member

Vote:

Member

Floppy commented Jul 18, 2017

Vote:

@Floppy

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Floppy

Floppy Jul 18, 2017

Member

I imagine @PaulJRobinson will have opinionson this as well, seeing as he is ex-military.

Member

Floppy commented Jul 18, 2017

I imagine @PaulJRobinson will have opinionson this as well, seeing as he is ex-military.

@Autumn-Leah

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Autumn-Leah

Autumn-Leah Jul 24, 2017

Contributor

Vote:

Contributor

Autumn-Leah commented Jul 24, 2017

Vote:

@openpolitics-bot openpolitics-bot merged commit 5a682e2 into openpolitics:master Jul 25, 2017

2 of 3 checks passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build failed
Details
votebot/time The change has been open long enough to be merged (age: 11d).
Details
votebot/votes The proposal has been agreed.
Details

@BrotherSideways BrotherSideways deleted the BrotherSideways:refs/heads/20170713140143 branch Jul 25, 2017

@BrotherSideways BrotherSideways restored the BrotherSideways:refs/heads/20170713140143 branch Jul 25, 2017

@BrotherSideways BrotherSideways deleted the BrotherSideways:refs/heads/20170713140143 branch Jul 25, 2017

@BrotherSideways BrotherSideways restored the BrotherSideways:refs/heads/20170713140143 branch Jul 28, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment