Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added a term limit policy to be debated. #624

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@ItamarC235
Copy link

@ItamarC235 ItamarC235 commented Jan 4, 2018

No description provided.

@openpolitics-bot
Copy link
Member

@openpolitics-bot openpolitics-bot commented Jan 4, 2018

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote symbol type this points
Yes :white_check_mark: 1
No :negative_squared_cross_mark: -1
Abstain 🤐 :zipper_mouth_face: 0
Block 🚫 :no_entry_sign: -1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

@ItamarC235, if you want to make further changes to this proposal, you can do so by clicking on the pencil icons here. If a change is made to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted, and votes must be recast.

@philipjohn
Copy link
Member

@philipjohn philipjohn commented Jan 12, 2018

I understand the reasons why this kind of thing is proposed, but I don't agree it's a solution. It was detailed in #569 and I offered a bunch of reasons there so I'll just refer to that debate and drop my vote here.

Vote:

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

@Floppy Floppy commented Jan 13, 2018

I still tend towards the idea, but I will go back and reread the discussion around #569 before voting here.

Vote: 🤐

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

@Floppy Floppy commented Jan 13, 2018

Crikey, that one went off topic a bit. I'll try to summarise the relevant parts here a bit later on.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

@Floppy Floppy commented Jan 13, 2018

@philipjohn so in that one, before it went off topic too badly, we were proposing term limits on full-time positions. This is a tighter set in this one, basically just MPs and the PM. The argument I understand from you is that it's unhelpful to limit the time in office for good MPs (of which there are many) in order to get rid of the bad ones, when electoral reform would make bad MPs easier to unseat, and would be preferable. Would you agree with that summary of your position?

@philipjohn
Copy link
Member

@philipjohn philipjohn commented Jan 13, 2018

Spot on!

@Xyleneb
Copy link
Contributor

@Xyleneb Xyleneb commented Jan 15, 2018

Vote: 🤐

Even if we concluded that "there should be a limit" I can't really decide what kind of limit. Don't you sort of wish that Obama could have served a third term?

@ItamarC235
Copy link
Author

@ItamarC235 ItamarC235 commented Jan 16, 2018

It doesn't matter how good a person is, giving one person a great amount of power for a long amount of time can only cause wrong doing, corruption, scandals, you name it, having a universal time limit makes politics fresh, prevents rotten politics and acts as a regulator upon the public officials.
Not to mention that not having a limit goes both ways, People will be able to vote officials like Trump and Netanyahu over and over again due to political apathy or blind interest if there was no limit, in case of Netanyahu thats the current state.
In my opinion we must have a limit, a universal one.

@openpolitics-bot
Copy link
Member

@openpolitics-bot openpolitics-bot commented Apr 5, 2018

Closed automatically: maximum age exceeded. Please feel free to resubmit this as a new proposal, but remember you will need to base any new proposal on the current policy text.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants