Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Razer Blade Stealth Late 2019 #962

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 10, 2020

Conversation

echap1
Copy link

@echap1 echap1 commented Dec 4, 2019

Just a copy from the previous blade stealth

I have the 1650 model with the 1080p screen and this works for me.

@echap1 echap1 changed the title Added support for Razer Blade Stealth Late 2019 Add support for Razer Blade Stealth Late 2019 Dec 4, 2019
@soren121
Copy link

soren121 commented Dec 4, 2019

This PR works great on my machine, the Iris Plus model. All five lighting modes work correctly.

@Nepharius88
Copy link

Works great for me too! Thank you a lot!

@stvnksslr
Copy link

works great for me as well with the iris plus model 👍

@z3ntu
Copy link
Member

z3ntu commented Jan 5, 2020

Hi, thanks for the PR. It generally looks fine, but could you test adding Starlight support, like #978 ?

@rustysec
Copy link

rustysec commented Jan 6, 2020

the late 2019 stealth is single zone rgb, starlight isn't supported.

@z3ntu z3ntu force-pushed the feature_stealthlate2019 branch from 55a49e1 to 9622acd Compare Jan 10, 2020
z3ntu
z3ntu approved these changes Jan 10, 2020
Copy link
Member

@z3ntu z3ntu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did some final touches (removing unnecessary changes)

LGTM, thank you for the contribution!

@z3ntu z3ntu force-pushed the feature_stealthlate2019 branch from 9622acd to 29307dc Compare Jan 10, 2020
@z3ntu z3ntu merged commit 29307dc into openrazer:master Jan 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants