Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove ancient comment with app startup #664

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2018

Conversation

eriknelson
Copy link
Contributor

The concern stands; we still want to consider graceful exit, but @maleck13 has raised some good points in #614 that sound like they're more golang-ish.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 19, 2018
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 19, 2018

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 4a75e54 on eriknelson:rm-main-comment into ** on openshift:master**.

@jmrodri
Copy link
Contributor

jmrodri commented Jan 19, 2018

Is this PR to address issue #614 ? If so update the commit to include the issue number

@eriknelson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jmrodri it's not. This is just removing an old comment that is tangentially related. 614 should get closed out with an implementation, IMO.

Copy link
Contributor

@shawn-hurley shawn-hurley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this needs a Bugzilla as it is removing text and no functional code IMO.

Copy link
Contributor

@jmrodri jmrodri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ack

@jmrodri jmrodri merged commit a76811c into openshift:master Jan 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. tech-debt
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants