Bug 1543521 - fix async bind when job already in-progress #764
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The broker now stores a reference to a bind job with the BindInstance, so that it can be looked up in the future if successive equivalent requests are received. fixes openshift#670 The solution was discussed here: openshift#680
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
size/L
eriknelson
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2018
rthallisey
approved these changes
Feb 15, 2018
jianzhangbjz
pushed a commit
to jianzhangbjz/ansible-service-broker
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2018
) The broker now stores a reference to a bind job with the BindInstance, so that it can be looked up in the future if successive equivalent requests are received. fixes openshift#670 The solution was discussed here: openshift#680
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The broker now stores a reference to a bind job with the BindInstance, so that
it can be looked up in the future if successive equivalent requests are
received.
fixes #670
The solution was discussed here: #680
The fix was merged into
release-1.1here: #750