New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1942883: Rebase to v0.10.1 #183
Bug 1942883: Rebase to v0.10.1 #183
Conversation
Remove arm overlay
Move cr.yaml out of github workflows
Add documentation for release process
Most application charts don't usually create `StorageClass`es. They create PVCs.
feat: Add option to provision StorageClasses
Bump chart version
Apply nodeSelector, affinity, tolerations and priorityClassName to snapshoter.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Berger <alex-berger@gmx.ch>
…elector More controll over snapshot-controller scheduling
…test Integrate external e2e test in the testsuits
…-error-code modify error message when request volume is in use with other node
Add support for node existing service accounts
…n-storage-classes Allow all fields to be set on StorageClasses
CSI controller and node have different needs in a manner of capacity so in this commit we enable users to define specific resources for the node component. This will allow users not to reserve not needed resources on all of their instances as node is a DaemonSet and may not need as much CPU/Memory as the controller Pods. Signed-off-by: dntosas <ntosas@gmail.com>
CSI components and especially the node one, may be critical for operators so in this commit we enable them to define priorities for this kind of Pods. Signed-off-by: dntosas <ntosas@gmail.com>
…verride-for-node [chart] Allow resources override for node DaemonSet + priorityClassName
Example of a possible env var would be: AWS_STS_REGIONAL_ENDPOINTS=regiojnal
Update chart values with controller envVars
Warn users about migrating nodes without fully draining them of mounted EBS volumes. Signed-off-by: Matt Wilder <me@partcyb.org>
|
@jsafrane: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942883, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@jsafrane: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942883, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@jsafrane: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942883, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (piqin@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
I fixed the OWNERS |
|
/retest |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: huffmanca, jsafrane The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@jsafrane: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1942883 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Diff to upstream v0.10.1:
kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver@v0.10.1...jsafrane:rebase-0.10.1
Changes in golang.org/x/crypto are expected - we use newer version to fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910238
It should fix following BZs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932133
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942883
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932135
(and many more upstream issues)
cc @openshift/storage