Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge upstream #211

Merged

Conversation

honza
Copy link
Member

@honza honza commented Mar 4, 2022

No description provided.

bfournie and others added 13 commits February 11, 2022 17:16
The root device hints have a rotational field which is a pointer to a bool.
Use DeepCopy and DeepEqual to ensure its handled properly.
This PR adds mac address validation for BootMACAddress if it is not empty.
This change reduces the resource footprint of the installation and paves
the way to dropping MariaDB by default (not a part of this patch).

TLS support is switched to use httpd as a reverse proxy.
Add mac address validation for BootMACAddress
If the ImageError condition is not set yet (which can happen before the
PreprovisioningImage controller reconciles the resource), we will get a
nil condition back from FindStatusCondition.
Make sure that the ImageReady condition value corresponds to the current
generation of the resource before declaring the image ready.
The PreprovisioningImage controller may wish to use information in the
host's labels to influence the image build, so copy all labels from the
Host to the Image to ensure that the controller has access to them
without having to retrieve the Host from the k8s API.
Use deep copy/equal for host root device hints
Copy labels from BaremetalHost to PreprovisioningImage
Switch the deployment to use a single ironic process
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dtantsur and zaneb March 4, 2022 17:04
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 4, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: honza

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 4, 2022
@bfournie
Copy link

bfournie commented Mar 4, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 4, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 5, 2022

@honza: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1206303 into openshift:master Mar 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants