Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1996624: Check for aws status in infra platform status field before client setup #399

Merged

Conversation

akhil-rane
Copy link
Contributor

We go for aws, if secret annotator implementation does not exist for a cloud
platform. The current code causes panic while doing aws client setup for
non-aws platform. This commit fixes it.

We use aws as default implementation for secret annotator. This
causes panic if aws status is nil in infrastucture.Status.PlatformStatus
field.
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 11, 2021

@akhil-rane: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996624, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1996624: Check for aws status in infra platform status field before client setup

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 11, 2021
@akhil-rane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @joelddiaz

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 11, 2021
@akhil-rane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 11, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 11, 2021

@akhil-rane: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996624, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lwan-wanglin

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #399 (d670c26) into master (fb3717b) will increase coverage by 0.44%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #399      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   46.96%   47.41%   +0.44%     
==========================================
  Files          82       82              
  Lines        8281     8363      +82     
==========================================
+ Hits         3889     3965      +76     
- Misses       3892     3899       +7     
+ Partials      500      499       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/operator/utils/aws/utils.go 45.23% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/cmd/provisioning/ibmcloud/service_id.go 89.24% <0.00%> (+1.52%) ⬆️
pkg/apis/cloudcredential/v1/register.go 87.50% <0.00%> (+1.78%) ⬆️

@lwan-wanglin
Copy link

Test pass using image with the PR merged.

  1. Install a cluster on openstack cloud
  2. Create a root aws-creds to kube-system namespace
  3. Check cco pod , pod doesn't crash
 $ oc get pods
NAME                                         READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
cloud-credential-operator-64bd974b87-phdqf   2/2     Running   0          6h45m
$ oc logs cloud-credential-operator-64bd974b87-phdqf -c cloud-credential-operator | grep "observed admin cloud credential secret event"
time="2021-10-12T01:53:21Z" level=info msg="observed admin cloud credential secret event" namespace=kube-system secret=openstack-credentials
time="2021-10-12T07:10:12Z" level=info msg="observed admin cloud credential secret event" namespace=kube-system secret=aws-creds
time="2021-10-12T07:21:43Z" level=info msg="observed admin cloud credential secret event" namespace=kube-system secret=gcp-credentials
time="2021-10-12T07:31:49Z" level=info msg="observed admin cloud credential secret event" namespace=kube-system secret=azure-credentials
time="2021-10-12T07:46:06Z" level=info msg="observed admin cloud credential secret event" namespace=kube-system secret=vsphere-creds

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Oct 12, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@joelddiaz joelddiaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
i'll open a Jira card so that we can do a proper "dummy" secret annotator so that we don't go down AWS codepaths unnecessarily in the future.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 12, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 12, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: akhil-rane, joelddiaz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [akhil-rane,joelddiaz]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d98946d into openshift:master Oct 12, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 12, 2021

@akhil-rane: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1996624 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1996624: Check for aws status in infra platform status field before client setup

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@akhil-rane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.9

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@akhil-rane: new pull request created: #405

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@joelddiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 20, 2021

@joelddiaz: Bugzilla bug 1996624 is in an unrecognized state (MODIFIED) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@akhil-rane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.7

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@akhil-rane: new pull request created: #427

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@akhil-rane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@akhil-rane: new pull request created: #430

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants