Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug 2100155: specify resource=pod for PSa violation alerts #1362

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 28, 2022
Merged

Bug 2100155: specify resource=pod for PSa violation alerts #1362

merged 1 commit into from Jun 28, 2022

Conversation

stlaz
Copy link
Member

@stlaz stlaz commented Jun 27, 2022

/assign @s-urbaniak

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 27, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@stlaz: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2100155, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.12.0" release, but it targets "4.11.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2100155: specify resource=pod for PSa violation alerts

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from mfojtik and tkashem June 27, 2022 09:56
@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@stlaz stlaz changed the base branch from master to release-4.11 June 27, 2022 09:58
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@stlaz: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2100155, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 2100155 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.12.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2100155: specify resource=pod for PSa violation alerts

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2022
@stlaz
Copy link
Member Author

stlaz commented Jun 27, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 27, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@stlaz: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2100155, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2101444 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is NEW instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2101444 to target a release in 4.12.0, but it targets "Premerge" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bparees bparees added the staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). label Jun 27, 2022
@mfojtik
Copy link
Member

mfojtik commented Jun 27, 2022

/approve

soltysh
soltysh approved these changes Jun 27, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, s-urbaniak, soltysh, stlaz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 27, 2022
@wallylewis
Copy link

/retest-required

@wallylewis
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@wallylewis: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2100155, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2101444 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 28, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2100155, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2101444 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@stlaz
Copy link
Member Author

stlaz commented Jun 28, 2022

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 28, 2022

@stlaz: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp 90905d2 link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node 90905d2 link false /test e2e-aws-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-single-node 90905d2 link false /test e2e-gcp-operator-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-aws 90905d2 link true /test e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-disruptive-single-node 90905d2 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-disruptive-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-single-node 90905d2 link false /test e2e-gcp-operator-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator 90905d2 link true /test e2e-gcp-operator
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial 90905d2 link true /test e2e-aws-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node 90905d2 link false /test e2e-aws-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-upgrade 90905d2 link true /test e2e-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-disruptive-single-node 90905d2 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-disruptive-single-node

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@stlaz
Copy link
Member Author

stlaz commented Jun 28, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 28, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 28, 2022

@stlaz: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2100155, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.11.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.11.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2101444 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2101444 targets the "4.12.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.12.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (ytripath@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit c7c94db into openshift:release-4.11 Jun 28, 2022
11 of 14 checks passed
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 28, 2022

@stlaz: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2100155 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2100155: specify resource=pod for PSa violation alerts

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@xingxingxia xingxingxia mentioned this pull request Aug 24, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@soltysh soltysh soltysh approved these changes

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

@tkashem tkashem Awaiting requested review from tkashem

Assignees

@s-urbaniak s-urbaniak

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead).
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@stlaz @s-urbaniak @mfojtik @wallylewis @openshift-bot @soltysh @bparees