Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1851928: [metrics] TargetDown alert is always fired in ovnkube-node job #689

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 8, 2020

Conversation

tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya tssurya commented Jul 2, 2020

The TargetDown alert was always getting fired for all the ovnkube-nodes
because the metrics-bind-address flag was not getting passed in the exec
command for the ovnkube-node container. This regression was introduced
in PR #615. Promethues was hence not able to scrape the up metrics.

Signed-off-by: Surya Seetharaman suryaseetharaman.9@gmail.com

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1851928, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1851928: [metrics] TargetDown alert is always fired in ovnkube-node job

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 2, 2020
@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 2, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 3, 2020

/retest

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 6, 2020

/assign @rcarrillocruz

The CI failures are unrelated. Not sure why the CI is acting crazy.

@danielmellado
Copy link
Contributor

Promethues

Small typo there, besides that, there have been a lot of CI issues, so let's retest it again, I had similar issues and they ought to be fixed now.

@danielmellado
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

…de job

The TargetDown alert was always getting fired for all the ovnkube-nodes
because the metrics-bind-address flag was not getting passed in the exec
command for the ovnkube-node container. This regression was introduced
in  PR openshift#615. Prometheus was hence not able to scrape the up metrics.

Signed-off-by: Surya Seetharaman <suryaseetharaman.9@gmail.com>
@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 6, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 6, 2020

/retest

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 6, 2020

/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-aws-sdn-single

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 6, 2020

/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-vsphere
/test e2e-ovn-step-registry

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 7, 2020

/retest

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 7, 2020

/test e2e-windows-hybrid-network
/test e2e-ovn-step-registry

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 7, 2020

/retest

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 7, 2020

/test e2e-windows-hybrid-network

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 7, 2020

/test e2e-vsphere

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 7, 2020

/retest

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

/retest

note that not all of the tests are required to pass; look in the list of tests at the bottom of the PR (just above the new-comment box); if it doesn't show "Required" next to the test, then it doesn't matter that it failed

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 7, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, tssurya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 7, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Jul 7, 2020

/lgtm

/retest

note that not all of the tests are required to pass; look in the list of tests at the bottom of the PR (just above the new-comment box); if it doesn't show "Required" next to the test, then it doesn't matter that it failed

ah good to know! thanks Dan for approving.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

15 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 8, 2020

@tssurya: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi 7ab4919 link /test e2e-metal-ipi
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere 7ab4919 link /test e2e-vsphere

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 60fb40f into openshift:master Jul 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/cluster-network-operator#689. Bugzilla bug 1851928 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1851928: [metrics] TargetDown alert is always fired in ovnkube-node job

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

vrutkovs commented Jul 8, 2020

/cherry-pick release-4.5

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@vrutkovs: new pull request created: #697

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants