Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1992875: Add azure credentials #206

Merged

Conversation

jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

Add credentials for Azure Disk CSI driver via cloud-credentials-operator.

In addition, pass name of cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator image to Azure CSI driver operator, so the operator can merge cloud config + the new credentials easily (see #openshift/azure-disk-csi-driver-operator#30).

Azure Disk CSI driver needs its own Secret on Azure Stack Hub.
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 30, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jsafrane

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 30, 2021
Copy link
Member

@bertinatto bertinatto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 31, 2021
@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

/hold
@jsafrane seems like you missed 10_deployment-ibm-cloud-managed.yaml

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 31, 2021
Pass name of cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator image to Azure CSI
driver operator, which needs it to merge Azure secrets.
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

seems like you missed 10_deployment-ibm-cloud-managed.yaml

Good catch! Fixed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 31, 2021
@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 31, 2021
@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

/retest

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2021
@wallylewis
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 1, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 1, 2021

@wallylewis: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1992875, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (wduan@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 1, 2021
@wallylewis
Copy link

/retest-required

2 similar comments
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsafrane commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsafrane commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsafrane commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsafrane commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsafrane commented Sep 2, 2021

/override e2e-aws-upgrade

I checked the failures, they do not seem to be caused by this PR.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 2, 2021

@jsafrane: /override requires a failed status context or a job name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts were given:

  • e2e-aws-upgrade

Only the following contexts were expected:

  • ci/prow/e2e-aws
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade
  • ci/prow/e2e-azure
  • ci/prow/e2e-azure-csi
  • ci/prow/e2e-gcp
  • ci/prow/e2e-vsphere
  • ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-csi
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/unit
  • ci/prow/verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-cluster-storage-operator-release-4.1-e2e-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-cluster-storage-operator-release-4.1-e2e-aws-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-cluster-storage-operator-release-4.1-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-cluster-storage-operator-release-4.1-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-cluster-storage-operator-release-4.1-verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-cluster-storage-operator-release-4.7-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-cluster-storage-operator-release-4.8-e2e-azure
  • pull-ci-openshift-cluster-storage-operator-release-4.8-e2e-azure-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-cluster-storage-operator-release-4.8-e2e-vsphere
  • pull-ci-openshift-cluster-storage-operator-release-4.8-e2e-vsphere-csi
  • tide

In response to this:

/override e2e-aws-upgrade

I checked the failures, they do not seem to be caused by this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsafrane commented Sep 2, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 2, 2021

@jsafrane: Overrode contexts on behalf of jsafrane: ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-gcp

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-azure

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsafrane commented Sep 3, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Faulty test crictl should be able to run crictl on the node is getting disabled in openshift/origin#26444.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 3, 2021

@jsafrane: Overrode contexts on behalf of jsafrane: ci/prow/e2e-gcp

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Faulty test crictl should be able to run crictl on the node is getting disabled in openshift/origin#26444.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2967702 into openshift:master Sep 3, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 3, 2021

@jsafrane: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 1992875 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1992875: Add azure credentials

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants