New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.8] Bug 2061266: Update e2e test to use 3scale operator to increase test stability #11141
[release-4.8] Bug 2061266: Update e2e test to use 3scale operator to increase test stability #11141
Conversation
@jerolimov: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@jerolimov: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@jerolimov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061266, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@jerolimov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061266, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
1 similar comment
@jerolimov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061266, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
89f5f12
to
dd63e09
Compare
@jerolimov: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jerolimov, karthikjeeyar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@jerolimov: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2061266 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is a manual backport of the PRs #11044 (master), respectively #11050 (4.10) and #11087 (4.9) to user the same operator on 4.8 as our E2E fails here again with the (renamed again?) CodeReady Workspaces operator.
Cherry-pick doesn't work, see #11087 (comment)
Some broken tests could be found here. https://prow.ci.openshift.org/pr-history/?org=openshift&repo=console&pr=11137
Build log contains this error
Error: ENAMETOOLONG: name too long
when this happens. 馃槅https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=Error%3A+ENAMETOOLONG%3A+name+too+long&maxAge=168h&context=0&type=all&name=pull-ci-openshift-console-release-4.8-e2e-gcp-console&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job
On March 7th this matches: 23 runs, 100% failed, 83% of failures match = 83% impact
Different namespaces in different branches:
Master #11044
console/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/integration-tests-cypress/tests/operator-install-single-namespace.spec.ts
Lines 7 to 18 in 61ad96b
4.10 #11050
console/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/integration-tests-cypress/tests/operator-install-single-namespace.spec.ts
Lines 7 to 18 in b6503ff
4.9 #11087
console/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/integration-tests-cypress/tests/operator-install-single-namespace.spec.ts
Lines 7 to 18 in 7271cb2
4.8 before:
console/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/integration-tests-cypress/tests/operator-install-single-namespace.spec.ts
Lines 7 to 18 in 954f718