Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1993147: Add aria-label for axe issues (Internal Mode Dashboard) #9251

Merged

Conversation

SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Contributor

@SanjalKatiyar SanjalKatiyar commented Jun 15, 2021

Fixes axe issues for Object and File & Block Dashboards.
Added aria-label for:
breakdown-chart --> used by Used Capacity Breakdown Card (Block & File Dashboard) and Capacity breakdown Card (Object Dashboard)
data-consumption-card-dropdown --> used by Performance Card (Object Dashboard)
data-consumption-graph --> used by Performance Card (Object Dashboard)


Just for information, there were 2 more notable axe issues with Used Capacity Breakdown Card, in the <Chart> component that we import from PatternFly:
Screenshot from 2021-06-16 13-30-09

Screenshot from 2021-06-16 13-32-22

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from bipuladh and rawagner June 15, 2021 13:01
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added component/ceph Related to ceph-storage-plugin kind/i18n Indicates issue or PR relates to internationalization or has content that needs to be translated labels Jun 15, 2021
@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-console
/test ceph-storage-plugin

@GowthamShanmugam
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@afreen23 afreen23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 10, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 10, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: afreen23, rexagod, SanjalKatiyar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 10, 2021
@SanjalKatiyar SanjalKatiyar changed the title Add aria-label for axe issues (Internal Mode Dashboard) Bug 1993147: Add aria-label for axe issues (Internal Mode Dashboard) Aug 12, 2021
@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@SanjalKatiyar: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (ratamir@redhat.com) for bug 1993147 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#secondary-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have exceeded a secondary rate limit. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1993147: Add aria-label for axe issues (Internal Mode Dashboard)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 12, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@SanjalKatiyar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1993147, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (ratamir@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@SanjalKatiyar: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (ratamir@redhat.com) for bug 1993147 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#secondary-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have exceeded a secondary rate limit. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@SanjalKatiyar: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (ratamir@redhat.com) for bug 1993147 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#secondary-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have exceeded a secondary rate limit. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1993147: Add aria-label for axe issues (Internal Mode Dashboard)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. label Aug 12, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2021

@SanjalKatiyar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1993147, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (ratamir@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 12, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

22 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@rawagner
Copy link
Contributor

rawagner commented Aug 16, 2021

/hold
ceph tests are broken

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 16, 2021
@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel
/test ceph-storage-plugin

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 17, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 4326788 into openshift:master Aug 17, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2021

@SanjalKatiyar: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1993147 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1993147: Add aria-label for axe issues (Internal Mode Dashboard)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.9 milestone Aug 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/ceph Related to ceph-storage-plugin kind/i18n Indicates issue or PR relates to internationalization or has content that needs to be translated lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants