Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[4.2] Bug 1755780: Disabled gosec #200

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #196

/assign ricardomaraschini

We are disabling this tool for now.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Disabled gosec.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 8, 2019
@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor

/retitle Bug 1755780: Disabled gosec

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.2] Disabled gosec. Bug 1755780: Disabled gosec Oct 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1755780, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.2.0" release, but it targets "4.2.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1749256 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1755780: Disabled gosec

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 8, 2019
@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor

The fix for the BZ mentioned on this PR is on #197 but for the latter to be merged this one needs to go in first.

@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @dmage @adambkaplan

Copy link
Contributor

@adambkaplan adambkaplan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Needed to ensure we can properly backport fixes.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adambkaplan, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 8, 2019
@dmage dmage changed the title Bug 1755780: Disabled gosec [4.2] Bug 1755780: Disabled gosec Oct 10, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

The requirements for Bugzilla bugs have changed, recalculating validity.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1755780, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1749256 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

The requirements for Bugzilla bugs have changed, recalculating validity.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ricardomaraschini: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1755780, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1749256 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 24, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ricardomaraschini: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1755780, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 24, 2019
@eparis
Copy link
Member

eparis commented Oct 24, 2019

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@eparis: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1755780, which is valid.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@eparis eparis added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 24, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@eparis
Copy link
Member

eparis commented Oct 24, 2019

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit acfafcf into openshift:release-4.2 Oct 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants