New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2045771: bump RHCOS 4.10 bootimage metadata #5932
Bug 2045771: bump RHCOS 4.10 bootimage metadata #5932
Conversation
These changes will update the RHCOS 4.10 boot image metadata in the installer which includes the fixes for the following BZs: Bug 2077998: Publish RHEL CoreOS AMIs in AWS ap-southeast-3 region Changes generated with: plume cosa2stream --target data/data/coreos/rhcos.json --distro rhcos --url https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases --no-signatures x86_64=410.84.202205191234-0 aarch64=410.84.202205191023-0 s390x=410.84.202205191234-0 ppc64le=410.84.202205191722-0
|
@mike-nguyen: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2045771, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 8 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: mike-nguyen. Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@mike-nguyen: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2045771, which is valid. 8 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest |
3 similar comments
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
The remaining failing tests have been failing for as far back as I can go in the prow job history. |
| "powervs": { | ||
| "release": "410.84.202201251004-0", | ||
| "formats": { | ||
| "ova.gz": { | ||
| "disk": { | ||
| "location": "https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.10-ppc64le/410.84.202201251004-0/ppc64le/rhcos-410.84.202201251004-0-powervs.ppc64le.ova.gz", | ||
| "sha256": "6ef2a5ba8a82a669e590ef38918f73b0924a9dd01d88fae1d18c71e611c52ee2", | ||
| "uncompressed-sha256": "114b265a4d9e9f3f8db8a79f6cd07955f09d918ee7d17b0ad7ecb04d16e31a70" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What happened to all the PowerVS artifacts and cloud uploads below?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
powervs isn't supported in 4.10
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes. not needed for 4.10. the pipeline has also stopped generating Power VS artifacts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks!
|
/lgtm |
|
/retest |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: travier The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
@miabbott: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Well great, that is not helpful. AFAICT I'm configured to provide that label |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
14 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
Each minor version of OCP requires a different version of RHCOS. The RHCOS bugs that require a new boot image fix issues related to initial provisioning. All other RHCOS bugs can be fixed through the RHCOS machine-os-content payload. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
a4b45c9
into
openshift:release-4.10
|
@mike-nguyen: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2045771 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
These changes will update the RHCOS 4.10 boot image metadata in the
installer which includes the fixes for the following BZs:
Bug 2077998: Publish RHEL CoreOS AMIs in AWS ap-southeast-3 region
Changes generated with:
plume cosa2stream --target data/data/coreos/rhcos.json --distro rhcos --url https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases --no-signatures x86_64=410.84.202205191234-0 aarch64=410.84.202205191023-0 s390x=410.84.202205191234-0 ppc64le=410.84.202205191722-0