New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1868645: UPSTREAM: 94087: kubelet: node sync at least once #522
Conversation
@ehashman: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1868645, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
running into a lot of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891068 flakes + VPC quota limits on AWS. Will retry just the GCP ones for now /test e2e-gcp |
/hold let's wait until we get the logspam patch in kubernetes#98137 |
/hold cancel |
/retest |
5 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
We might want to override the e2e-agnostic-cmd test, it's failing for everyone. https://prow.ci.openshift.org/job-history/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/directory/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-agnostic-cmd @rphillips @mrunalp would you PTAL? :) |
/retest |
/lgtm |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ehashman, rphillips, sjenning The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/test k8s-e2e-gcp |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@ehashman: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@ehashman: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1868645 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.6 |
@ehashman: new pull request created: #582 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Sync node at least once, avoiding pods getting stuck in NodeAffinity status.
Upstream bug: kubernetes#92067
Upstream PR: kubernetes#94087
BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868645
/cc @rphillips @mrunalp