Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1757836: pkg/daemon: add check for logger in CentOS #1111

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 28, 2019

Conversation

yrobla
Copy link
Contributor

@yrobla yrobla commented Sep 12, 2019

Currently this check for journal is just executed in the case of RHEL (for 7.6) . But with CentOS we are in the same situation.
So the fix is as simple as to add the CentOS check to the conditional.
In order to verify it, i just added a CentOS worker. Before that, it was failing in MCP with that logger failure. With the patch, node reports fine.

- Description for the changelog
Add check for logger in CentOS

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 12, 2019
pkg/daemon/daemon.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@runcom runcom added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 12, 2019
@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Sep 12, 2019

cc @mrguitar for awareness

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

In the commit I see:
yrobla authored and root committed 13 hours ago

Can you fix this to be the committer? Not sure what this is...

@yrobla
Copy link
Contributor Author

yrobla commented Sep 13, 2019

In the commit I see:
yrobla authored and root committed 13 hours ago

Can you fix this to be the committer? Not sure what this is...

I just pushed with root user by error, that's the reason of it. I amended.

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice changed the title Add check for logger in CentOS pkg/daemon: add check for logger in CentOS Sep 13, 2019
@runcom runcom removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 24, 2019
@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Sep 24, 2019

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 24, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: runcom, yrobla

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 24, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

11 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 63a0e38 into openshift:master Sep 28, 2019
@runcom runcom changed the title pkg/daemon: add check for logger in CentOS Bug 1757836: pkg/daemon: add check for logger in CentOS Oct 2, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yrobla: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1757836 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1757836: pkg/daemon: add check for logger in CentOS

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants