Bug 1689149 - adding secret names to SA for whitelisting

[ewolinetz]

Addresses issue where secrets are required to be whitelisted for service accounts.
Affects releases:

• 3.11
• 3.10
• 3.9

ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689149

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ewolinetz: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7	1f86f2e	link	/test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[vrutkovs]

roles/openshift_logging_elasticsearch/tasks/main.yaml:
  70:7      error    wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 6  (indentation)
  79:7      error    wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 6  (indentation)
roles/openshift_logging_mux/tasks/main.yaml:
  59:3      error    wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2  (indentation)
  106:5     error    wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4  (indentation)
  127:5     error    wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4  (indentation)
  148:5     error    wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4  (indentation)
  152:5     error    wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4  (indentation)
  166:5     error    wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4  (indentation)
  203:3     error    wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2  (indentation)
  212:5     error    wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4  (indentation)
yamllint issues found

[ewolinetz]

@vrutkovs travis passed

[richm]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ewolinetz, richm

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• roles/openshift_logging_curator/OWNERS [ewolinetz]
• roles/openshift_logging_elasticsearch/OWNERS [ewolinetz]
• roles/openshift_logging_fluentd/OWNERS [ewolinetz]
• roles/openshift_logging_kibana/OWNERS [ewolinetz]
• roles/openshift_logging_mux/OWNERS [ewolinetz,richm]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ewolinetz]

/cherrypick release-3.10
/cherrypick release-3.9

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@ewolinetz: #11359 failed to apply on top of branch "release-3.10":

error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	roles/openshift_logging_curator/tasks/main.yaml
M	roles/openshift_logging_elasticsearch/tasks/main.yaml
M	roles/openshift_logging_fluentd/tasks/main.yaml
M	roles/openshift_logging_kibana/tasks/main.yaml
M	roles/openshift_logging_mux/tasks/main.yaml
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging roles/openshift_logging_mux/tasks/main.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in roles/openshift_logging_mux/tasks/main.yaml
Auto-merging roles/openshift_logging_kibana/tasks/main.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in roles/openshift_logging_kibana/tasks/main.yaml
Auto-merging roles/openshift_logging_fluentd/tasks/main.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in roles/openshift_logging_fluentd/tasks/main.yaml
Auto-merging roles/openshift_logging_elasticsearch/tasks/main.yaml
Auto-merging roles/openshift_logging_curator/tasks/main.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in roles/openshift_logging_curator/tasks/main.yaml
Patch failed at 0001 Bug 1689149 - adding secret names to SA for whitelisting

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-3.10
/cherrypick release-3.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ewolinetz]

/cherrypick release-3.9

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@ewolinetz: #11359 failed to apply on top of branch "release-3.9":

error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	roles/openshift_logging_curator/tasks/main.yaml
M	roles/openshift_logging_elasticsearch/tasks/main.yaml
M	roles/openshift_logging_fluentd/tasks/main.yaml
M	roles/openshift_logging_kibana/tasks/main.yaml
M	roles/openshift_logging_mux/tasks/main.yaml
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging roles/openshift_logging_mux/tasks/main.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in roles/openshift_logging_mux/tasks/main.yaml
Auto-merging roles/openshift_logging_kibana/tasks/main.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in roles/openshift_logging_kibana/tasks/main.yaml
Auto-merging roles/openshift_logging_fluentd/tasks/main.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in roles/openshift_logging_fluentd/tasks/main.yaml
Auto-merging roles/openshift_logging_elasticsearch/tasks/main.yaml
Auto-merging roles/openshift_logging_curator/tasks/main.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in roles/openshift_logging_curator/tasks/main.yaml
Patch failed at 0001 Bug 1689149 - adding secret names to SA for whitelisting

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-3.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.