Skip to content

Conversation

@JStickler
Copy link
Contributor

@JStickler JStickler commented Dec 7, 2021

Adding a sentence to the New Features topic that I hope addresses the confusion around whether Jaeger is still part of the distributed tracing solution.

BZ2029218
BZ2029221

Preview is here -> https://deploy-preview-39611--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/jaeger/distributed-tracing-release-notes#distr-tracing-rn-new-features_distributed-tracing-release-notes

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 7, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 7, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for osdocs ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 43583d0

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/osdocs/deploys/61af93544f7f4000077f5ee3

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-39611--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/jaeger/distributed-tracing-release-notes

* Introduces a new OpenTelemetry Operator based on OpenTelemetry 0.33. Note that this Operator is a Technology Preview.
* Updates {ProductShortName} Operator to Jaeger 1.28. Going forward, {ProductName} will only support the `stable` Operator channel. Channels for individual releases are no longer supported.

* Introduces a new OpenTelemetry Operator based on OpenTelemetry 0.33. Note that this Operator is a Technology Preview.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We shouldn't refer to this as the 'OpenTelemetry Operator', we should refer to this as the 'Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing data collection' operator which is based on OpenTelemetry 0.33

This release includes the following:

* Introduces a new OpenTelemetry Operator based on OpenTelemetry 0.33. Note that this Operator is a Technology Preview.
* Updates {ProductShortName} Operator to Jaeger 1.28. Going forward, {ProductName} will only support the `stable` Operator channel. Channels for individual releases are no longer supported.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We may want to make it more clear that its based on Jaeger 1.28 and not that it is Jaeger 1.28

== New features and enhancements {ProductName} 2.0.0

This release marks the rebranding of Red Hat OpenShift Jaeger to {ProductName}. This effort includes the following:
This release marks the rebranding of Red Hat OpenShift Jaeger to {ProductName}. This name change is to reflect that the distributed tracing solution encompasses more than just Jaeger project components, but also Elasticsearch, AMQ Streams, and OpenTelemetry. The rebranding also allows for new technologies and components to be added in the future under the distributed tracing name.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if I would mention Elasticsearch and AMQ stream here. Those are components which we can use with our distributed tracing solution, but they are their own separate components. Elasticsearch and AMQ streams are also not something new with this release or as part of our rebranding.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 22, 2021

@JStickler: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 22, 2021
@JStickler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing since this was supposed to be a quick fix until #39643 merged, and #39643 is merged.

@JStickler JStickler closed this Jan 11, 2022
@JStickler JStickler deleted the BZ2029218 branch April 1, 2022 20:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.6 branch/enterprise-4.7 branch/enterprise-4.8 branch/enterprise-4.9 branch/enterprise-4.10 needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. service-mesh Label for all Service Mesh PRs size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants