Skip to content

Conversation

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor

@theashiot theashiot commented Sep 1, 2025

Version(s): 6.1

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2326

Link to docs preview: https://98302--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-logging/latest/release_notes/logging-release-notes-6.1.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: Note that this PR includes 6.17 release notes because they were missing. The contents of the 6.17 release notes had been reviewed here: #94862

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 1, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2326 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.1

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2326

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 1, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 1, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Sep 1, 2025

🤖 Wed Sep 10 10:53:00 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://98302--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-logging/latest/release_notes/logging-release-notes-6.1.html

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 1, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2326 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.1

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2326

Link to docs preview: https://98302--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-logging/latest/release_notes/logging-release-notes-6.1.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 1, 2025
@vparfonov
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2025
@anpingli
Copy link

anpingli commented Sep 1, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 1, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 1, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2326 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.1

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2326

Link to docs preview: https://98302--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-logging/latest/release_notes/logging-release-notes-6.1.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @vparfonov, @anpingli !

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 1, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2326 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.1

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2326

Link to docs preview: https://98302--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-logging/latest/release_notes/logging-release-notes-6.1.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: Note that this PR includes 6.17 release notes because they were missing. The contents of the 6.17 release notes had been reviewed here: #94862

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@gabriel-rh gabriel-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - good work!

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @gabriel-rh!

@theashiot theashiot force-pushed the OBSDOCS-2326 branch 2 times, most recently from a0d4ca5 to 9748612 Compare September 10, 2025 09:26
[id="logging-release-notes-6-1-8_{context}"]
= Logging 6.1.8 Release Notes

This release includes includes link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:15565[RHBA-2025:15565].
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
This release includes includes link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:15565[RHBA-2025:15565].
This release includes link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:15565[RHBA-2025:15565].

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed


* Before this update, the `vector_buffer_byte_size` and `vector_buffer_events` metrics incorrectly reported negative values under certain system load and timing conditions. This led to unreliable monitoring, potentially masking buffer issues. With this update, a concurrent, centralized state tracker ensures that these metrics are always reported as non-negative values. This ensures that the metrics correctly report buffer sizes helping with accurate monitoring. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/LOG-7594[LOG-7594])

* Before this update, a log record with a malformed timestamp could cause the Vector agent to panic when attempting to forward logs to Loki. With this update, error handling for out-of-range timestamp values has been improved resolving the issue. (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/LOG-7600[LOG-7600])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this have "link" in the link?

Suggested change
* Before this update, a log record with a malformed timestamp could cause the Vector agent to panic when attempting to forward logs to Loki. With this update, error handling for out-of-range timestamp values has been improved resolving the issue. (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/LOG-7600[LOG-7600])
* Before this update, a log record with a malformed timestamp could cause the Vector agent to panic when attempting to forward logs to Loki. With this update, error handling for out-of-range timestamp values has been improved resolving the issue. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/LOG-7600[LOG-7600])

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

[NOTE]
====
For detailed information on Red{nbsp}Hat security ratings, review link:https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important[Severity ratings].
==== No newline at end of file
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
====
====

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @briandooley, I've made the required changes.

Best,
ashwin

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 10, 2025

@theashiot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@briandooley briandooley merged commit c020f18 into openshift:standalone-logging-docs-6.1 Sep 10, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants