Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-3.11] Bug 1795393: Add more states to init probe #1822

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jan 28, 2020

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1786

/assign jcantrill

Ref https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795393

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1748478, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 1748478 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-3.11] Bug 1748478: Add more states to init probe

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1748478, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 1748478 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-3.11] Bug 1748478: Add more states to init probe

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jcantrill jcantrill changed the title [release-3.11] Bug 1748478: Add more states to init probe [release-3.11] Bug 1795393: Add more states to init probe Jan 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1795393, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1795393 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-3.11] Bug 1795393: Add more states to init probe

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jcantrill: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1795393, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 28, 2020
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 29, 2020
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 29, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jwforres jwforres removed their request for review January 29, 2020 15:31
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/refresh

1 similar comment
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/refresh

@jcantrill jcantrill closed this Apr 24, 2020
@jcantrill jcantrill reopened this Apr 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1795393, which is valid.

5 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (3.11.z) matches configured target release for branch (3.11.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1748478 is in the state CLOSED (ERRATA), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

[release-3.11] Bug 1795393: Add more states to init probe

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 24, 2020
@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

/hold
/lgtm cancel

We've reported a failed job status to the last commit for this PR over 1,000 times and can no longer do so. Please push a new commit to fix the test.

This SHA and context has reached the maximum number of statuses.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 24, 2020
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Excluding eventrouter test to make CI reliable for 3.11 verus flake for little used feature
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jun 11, 2020
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcantrill, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a291dd9 into openshift:release-3.11 Jul 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/origin-aggregated-logging#1822. Bugzilla bug 1795393 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-3.11] Bug 1795393: Add more states to init probe

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants