Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement 'oc create pvc' to allow volume claim separate to mounting. #10700

Closed
GrahamDumpleton opened this issue Aug 29, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@GrahamDumpleton
Copy link

In the web interface you can request storage (make a claim), separate to then associating that storage (mounting it) to a particular deployment config (application).

In the REST interface, or using resource objects with oc create -f, you need to create a PersistentVolumeClaim definition independent of where it may be later used.

With the oc command line, your only option with oc set volume is either claim and mount storage in one operation, or mount storage from an existing claim.

To provide parity with web interface and REST interface where a claim can be executed as a separate operation, there should be a oc create pvc command. The only thing this would do is allow you to make a claim for storage of set size and optionally name it. This would allow the claim to be more easily created in advance of it then being used.

It would also make the story around explaining the usage of volumes easier as one could then explain a single scenario for all interfaces, web interface, REST API, resources and command line. That is, that can create claim as one step, and then mount as second step. This is easier to understand than the more complicated behaviour of oc set volume where claim and mount done in one step, with it differing from two step process of web interface and REST API or resources.

@ncdc
Copy link
Member

ncdc commented Aug 29, 2016

This code will go into Kube, so I'm going to turn this into a Trello card and we'll track progress there.

https://trello.com/c/sH6GuGwr

@ncdc ncdc closed this as completed Aug 29, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants