Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: 75785: add annotation from namespace controller to indicate… #22429

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 8, 2019

Conversation

deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k deads2k commented Mar 28, 2019

… why deletion failed

/assign @mfojtik

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 28, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 28, 2019
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Mar 29, 2019

/test all

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Mar 29, 2019

/retest

2 similar comments
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Mar 29, 2019

/retest

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Mar 29, 2019

/retest

@@ -295,6 +298,20 @@ func (d *namespacedResourcesDeleter) updateNamespaceStatusFunc(namespace *v1.Nam
return d.nsClient.UpdateStatus(&newNamespace)
}

// updateSetDeletionFailureFunc will set an annotation indicating that the namespace controller has failed to delete all content
func (d *namespacedResourcesDeleter) updateSetDeletionFailureFunc(err error) func(namespace *v1.Namespace) (*v1.Namespace, error) {
errorAnnotationName := "namespace-controller.kube-controller-manager.kubernetes.io/deletion-error"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

before merge, I need to update this to be an alpha something in openshift.io for when the real status pull gets merged upstream

@deads2k deads2k force-pushed the ns-controller branch 3 times, most recently from 8030349 to dc6dbf8 Compare April 8, 2019 12:02
@mfojtik
Copy link
Member

mfojtik commented Apr 8, 2019

neat

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, mfojtik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Apr 8, 2019

makes debugging ns cleanup possible. It's green, needed for debugging other issues.

@deads2k deads2k merged commit 5678258 into openshift:master Apr 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@deads2k: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws 423816e link /test e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants