Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-3.10] Bug 1696394: Set reasonable DNSIP consistent with kubelet #22487

Merged

Conversation

pravisankar
Copy link

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 4, 2019
@pravisankar
Copy link
Author

/test e2e-gcp-launch

@pravisankar
Copy link
Author

/retest

@pravisankar
Copy link
Author

@openshift/sig-network-edge @knobunc PTAL

@pravisankar
Copy link
Author

Similar to #22485 except some conflicts/changes in pkg/cmd/server/start/bootstrap_node.go
@ironcladlou @Miciah @knobunc PTAL

@pravisankar
Copy link
Author

/retest

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 11, 2019
@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor

knobunc commented Apr 16, 2019

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 16, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

12 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@pravisankar
Copy link
Author

/refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 25, 2019
@pravisankar
Copy link
Author

Build failure not related to this pr.

[INFO] [07:27:03+0000]   $ hack/build-go.sh tools/rebasehelpers/commitchecker
/home/travis/gopath/src/github.com/openshift/origin/hack/lib/constants.sh: line 129: OS_GIT_MAJOR: unbound variable
[ERROR] [07:27:07+0000] PID 4454: hack/lib/constants.sh:129: `ldflags+=($(os::build::ldflag "${OS_GO_PACKAGE}/pkg/version.majorFromGit" "${OS_GIT_MAJOR}"))` exited with status 1.

@stevekuznetsov @sdodson I see that previous commits on release-3.10 branch are merged with '/override continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr' tag, can you add this tag to this pr or let me know what's needed to merge this pr?

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 25, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ironcladlou, knobunc, pravisankar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 26, 2019

/hold
CI is looping on retests, clear this once the travis-ci status is green or overridden.

The last time I overrode that status it resulted in problems and I'm not familiar with those failures so I don't feel comfortable overriding it. I suggest asking @knobunc

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 26, 2019
@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 26, 2019

/override continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr

In response to this:

/override continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 26, 2019

Overridden on behalf of @knobunc

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 26, 2019

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 26, 2019
@pravisankar
Copy link
Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6c78c44 into openshift:release-3.10 Apr 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/network-edge size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants