New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-3078: Backkport OCPBUGS-1718 to release 4.10 #146
OCPBUGS-3078: Backkport OCPBUGS-1718 to release 4.10 #146
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 83d738e)
@raptorsun: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@raptorsun: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3078, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/jira refresh |
@raptorsun: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3078, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/jira refresh |
@raptorsun: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3078, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: juzhao. Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest-required |
@raptorsun: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
tested PR with SNO cluster, prometheus version is 2.32.1, rebooted the node for a few times, did not see the error "opening storage failed: /prometheus/chunks_head/**". |
/label qe-approved |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: raptorsun, simonpasquier The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@raptorsun: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3078 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build golang-github-prometheus-prometheus-container-v4.10.0-202305011254.p0.gb91d7c7.assembly.stream for distgit golang-github-prometheus-prometheus. |
This PR backport the fix of 'invalid magic number 0' bug to the release 4.10.
Original PR on upstream: prometheus#11338
PR on release 4.11: #143