Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.8] Bug 1995871: Disable conntrack for vxlan traffic #337

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #335

/assign astoycos

It is not needed because vxlan always uses the same destination port (4789 by default) for every packet.
Keeping it can be a source of performance issues on large clusters.

(cherry picked from commit 5c7c5f7)
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1985336 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1995871. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.8] Bug 1995871: Disable conntrack for vxlan traffic

In response to this:

[release-4.8] Bug 1985336: Disable conntrack for vxlan traffic

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.8] Bug 1985336: Disable conntrack for vxlan traffic [release-4.8] Bug 1995871: Disable conntrack for vxlan traffic Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995871, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1985336 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.8] Bug 1995871: Disable conntrack for vxlan traffic

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 20, 2021
@astoycos
Copy link

/retest

@astoycos
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 24, 2021

@astoycos: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995871, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1995872 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1995873 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1995872 to target a release in 4.9.0, but it targets "4.7.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1995873 to target a release in 4.9.0, but it targets "4.6.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@astoycos
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 24, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 24, 2021

@astoycos: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995871, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1985336 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1985336 targets the "4.9.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.9.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhaozhanqi

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 24, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from zhaozhanqi August 24, 2021 20:24
@abhat
Copy link
Contributor

abhat commented Aug 24, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 24, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 24, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhat, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 24, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jupierce jupierce added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Aug 27, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 332fbe7 into openshift:release-4.8 Aug 27, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 27, 2021

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1995871 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.8] Bug 1995871: Disable conntrack for vxlan traffic

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants