New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1890939: Handle pods from other kinds properly #25
Bug 1890939: Handle pods from other kinds properly #25
Conversation
|
@zshi-redhat: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@zshi-redhat: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@zshi-redhat: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@zshi-redhat: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890939, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
* update k8s.io/client-go version * accormmodate client-go API changes * Use alpine golang-1.13 for building image Build image with golang-1.12 hit below error after upgrading vendor pkgs: vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/errors/errors.go:99:10: undefined: errors.Is
* Handle pods properly from deployment, daemonset or statefulset This commit makes sure appropriate namespace is retrieved from pod's replicaset/daemonset/replicaset incase if its deployed using other kinds. It would enable network-resources-injector to look for network- attachment-definition object from the correct namespace. Signed-off-by: Periyasamy Palanisamy <periyasamy.palanisamy@est.tech> * Add check for replicationcontroller pod Signed-off-by: Periyasamy Palanisamy <periyasamy.palanisamy@est.tech> * Use switch case instead of if-else logic Signed-off-by: Periyasamy Palanisamy <periyasamy.palanisamy@est.tech>
336ab59
to
c25dbe2
Compare
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
2 similar comments
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/cc @pliurh |
|
/lgtm |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dougbtv, knobunc, zshi-redhat The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@dougbtv: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1890939 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@sdodson: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890939, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
5 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@zshi-redhat: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1890939 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
* update k8s.io/client-go version * accormmodate client-go API changes * Use alpine golang-1.13 for building image Build image with golang-1.12 hit below error after upgrading vendor pkgs: vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/errors/errors.go:99:10: undefined: errors.Is
* update k8s.io/client-go version * accormmodate client-go API changes * Use alpine golang-1.13 for building image Build image with golang-1.12 hit below error after upgrading vendor pkgs: vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/errors/errors.go:99:10: undefined: errors.Is
No description provided.