-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Detect arm64-*-*bsd and enable assembly optimizations #17084
Conversation
Upstream: * openssl/openssl#17082 * openssl/openssl#17084 PR: 259937 Submitted by: allanjude Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33062
|
I am not sure this is acceptable with CLA: trivial. Would you please consider signing a regular CLA? https://www.openssl.org/policies/cla.html |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Border line on the trivial. A CLA is the best way forwards.
Otherwise it looks good.
1bd08d3
to
3d14d13
Compare
|
I've signed an ICLA |
|
CLA is good. |
Upstream: * openssl/openssl#17082 * openssl/openssl#17084 PR: 259937 Submitted by: allanjude Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33062
|
Merged to master, thanks for the contribution. |
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> (Merged from #17084)
|
This needs to be cherry-picked to 3.0 when merging #17085 to avoid regression. |
|
24 hours has passed since 'approval: done' was set, but as this PR has been updated in that time the label 'approval: ready to merge' is not being automatically set. Please review the updates and set the label manually. |
|
Agreed. |
|
Cherry picked to 3.0 branch. |
CLA: trivial