Reporter: EvanE [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 4.09pm, Wednesday, 17th March 2010]
Finally the forum search is working, very fine.
There is one little piece, that could be done better:
Text, that define an url (enclosed in url and /url) is not included in the search.
This can be annoying, if you know part of the url but not the exact phrasing around the url.
Example: "fbinter" is part of an url and will not be found (which google does) whereas a search for "FIS-Brocker" in the same article will be found by the forum search. (it's in forum users:Germany)
PS: Please move this request to the appropriate catagory. I wasn't shure which one to take.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: TomH [Added to the original trac issue at 12.02am, Thursday, 18th March 2010]
The forums are not handled here - they're actually maintained by an OSM end user and not by the core admin team. I suggest you use the appropriate facilities on the forums to contact the forum administrator.
Author: EvanE [Added to the original trac issue at 2.21am, Sunday, 21st March 2010]
Replying to [comment:1 TomH]:
The forums are not handled here - they're actually maintained by an OSM end user and not by the core admin team. I suggest you use the appropriate facilities on the forums to contact the forum administrator.
Thanks for your fast response.
I've done as you proposed.
Reporter: EvanE
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 4.09pm, Wednesday, 17th March 2010]
Finally the forum search is working, very fine.
There is one little piece, that could be done better:
Text, that define an url (enclosed in url and /url) is not included in the search.
This can be annoying, if you know part of the url but not the exact phrasing around the url.
Example: "fbinter" is part of an url and will not be found (which google does) whereas a search for "FIS-Brocker" in the same article will be found by the forum search. (it's in forum users:Germany)
PS: Please move this request to the appropriate catagory. I wasn't shure which one to take.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: