Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

Node layer #300

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Node layer #300

openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

@openstreetmap-trac openstreetmap-trac commented Jul 23, 2021

Reporter: crschmidt[at]crschmidt.net
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 11.48pm, Saturday, 25th November 2006]

Make non-essential nodes (e.g. amenities) layers that can be toggled, probably in logical groupings to avoid there being too many layers. Then users can quickly show post offices & boxes, recycling points, pubs or any other feature they like without needing them all on at the same time.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

@openstreetmap-trac openstreetmap-trac commented Jul 23, 2021

Author: kleptog
[Added to the original trac issue at 11.45am, Friday, 28th September 2007]

I've prototyped something like this:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~kleptog/pois/pois.html
It needs fine-tuning like you mention, but I havn't got any feedback on how people would like that.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

@openstreetmap-trac openstreetmap-trac commented Jul 23, 2021

Author: philippep62[at]gmail.com
[Added to the original trac issue at 12.28pm, Monday, 7th July 2008]

That's one thing I personnaly would approve : a basic map , with different layers for shops, amenities , ...
But your prototype does not protowork :)

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

@openstreetmap-trac openstreetmap-trac commented Jul 23, 2021

Author: Ldp
[Added to the original trac issue at 9.35pm, Wednesday, 16th March 2011]

Sounds really interesting, as a separate project! In fact, there may have been more attempts and prototypes in the past years, but I don't see this happening on the main map.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant