You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: ponzu [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 5.18am, Wednesday, 13th April 2011]
I could list a number of specific instances of cities being listed as belonging to a wrong county (Santa Monica, Los Angeles, Beverly Hills and a number of other cities are listed as being in Ventura County - they should be in Los Angeles county) but I suspect there is a broader issue with the parent-child schema and/or tagging of places in Southern California.
I tried to summarize my findings here http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=11945 if that helps. I just want to know if it's a bug in Nominatim, poor OSM data, or my understanding of how Nominatim is supposed to work is off. I'll be happy with any explanation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: ponzu [Added to the original trac issue at 8.50pm, Wednesday, 13th April 2011]
Since creating the ticket, I have gathered almost all pieces of the puzzle. The problem arises from the presence of county nodes (and city nodes as well) in addition to polygons. The problem for Nominatim is solved by removing the nodes. At the same time, this will cause Mapnik-rendered maps to lose county and city labels as Mapnik only renders names of place nodes.. The wiki-documented role=label on the boundary relation would solve this rendering issue, but it has not been implemented in Mapnik and reportedly works only so-so in osmarender. The question then becomes do I open a ticket for Mapnik to render county (and other administrative boundary) labels, or is it already in the works?
The second question: do I delete the county (city, etc.) nodes where polygons or relations exist, or do I wait until the rendering of labels is implemented?
Author: ponzu [Added to the original trac issue at 7.26am, Saturday, 23rd April 2011]
I think I'll change it back to Nominatim. I have learned what the Mapnik plans are for rendering the place polygon labels, now I would like to hear how Nominatim can resolve such issues on their end.
Reporter: ponzu
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 5.18am, Wednesday, 13th April 2011]
I could list a number of specific instances of cities being listed as belonging to a wrong county (Santa Monica, Los Angeles, Beverly Hills and a number of other cities are listed as being in Ventura County - they should be in Los Angeles county) but I suspect there is a broader issue with the parent-child schema and/or tagging of places in Southern California.
Here's a search for Los Angeles: http://open.mapquestapi.com/nominatim/v1/search.php?q=los+angeles
I tried to summarize my findings here http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=11945 if that helps. I just want to know if it's a bug in Nominatim, poor OSM data, or my understanding of how Nominatim is supposed to work is off. I'll be happy with any explanation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: