/netjsonconfig

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement "configuration variables", additional jinja2 context #39

Closed
nemesisdesign opened this Issue Feb 15, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

Assignees

@nemesisdesign nemesisdesign

Labels
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
1 participant
@nemesisdesign
@nemesisdesign
Member

nemesisdesign commented Feb 15, 2016

See openwisp/django-netjsonconfig#18

@nemesisdesign nemesisdesign added the enhancement label Feb 15, 2016

@nemesisdesign nemesisdesign self-assigned this Feb 15, 2016

@nemesisdesign nemesisdesign changed the title from Implement additional variables to Implement "configuration variables", additional jinja2 context Feb 16, 2016

nemesisdesign added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2016

@nemesisdesign
Added "Configuration Variables" feature #39
4f6e8f0

nemesisdesign added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2016

@nemesisdesign
[docs] Added section "Context: configuration variables" #39
Loading status checks…
a78ffed

nemesisdesign added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2016

@nemesisdesign
[docs] Added "variables" in feature list #39
Loading status checks…
d22f036

nemesisdesign added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2016

@nemesisdesign
Minor improvement to forbidden characters exception message #39
bb00efd

nemesisdesign added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2016

@nemesisdesign
Added variables to command line utility #39
a3486d2

nemesisdesign added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2016

@nemesisdesign
Changed syntax of configuration variables #39 
The proposed syntax ${var} can cause conflicts with shell scripts
which can be included in the files section of the configuration
dictionary. To avoid any ambiguity, the syntax has been reverted to
the default jinja2 syntax.
Loading status checks…
3c8e1a2
@nemesisdesign

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Member

nemesisdesign commented Feb 17, 2016

Ready 👍

@nemesisdesign nemesisdesign closed this Feb 17, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment