Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FS#320 - relayd feature request #5356

Open
openwrt-bot opened this issue Dec 3, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

FS#320 - relayd feature request #5356

openwrt-bot opened this issue Dec 3, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@openwrt-bot
Copy link

openwrt-bot commented Dec 3, 2016

finas:

I found a couple of bugs with relayd based bridge configuration and I would like to suggest a feature request. Will fill one entry per issue:

On today's trunk

3- in a configuration where the network attached to the wireless radio is configured via DHCP, the listening interface is not set up automatically. DD-WRT and Gargoyle do this automatically ( they overwrite the config/network file with the gateway parameter and reload relayd.

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

openwrt-bot commented Dec 3, 2016

jow-:

Rewriting user configurations based on DHCP events is an absolute no-go, we need to find a better solution here.

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

openwrt-bot commented Dec 9, 2016

finas:

makes sense.
Do you have any idea on how this can be processed? maybe relayd must be extended to support this?

relayd was made by nbd, right?

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

openwrt-bot commented Dec 9, 2016

jow-:

Yes, the easiest would be to extend relayd or to extend the init script of relayd to fetch the gateway info from ubus. Then we could install hotplug events to reload relayd on dhcp changes.

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

openwrt-bot commented Dec 15, 2016

finas:

cool. extending the init script seems easier.

Thanks for the input. hoping someone will pick this down the road, I had to resort to gargoyle for a specific case where I really needed this functionality and it kills me really.

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

openwrt-bot commented Mar 3, 2017

finas:

Hi guys,

Any decision regarding implementing this?

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

openwrt-bot commented Mar 3, 2017

jow-:

Yes, it would be nice. Someone just has to do it :)

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

openwrt-bot commented Mar 3, 2017

finas:

like, someone like nbd ;)

@openwrt-bot
Copy link
Author

openwrt-bot commented May 30, 2017

finas:

please?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant