Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

NAT: automatic vs. manual mappings #106

Closed
fichtner opened this issue Mar 25, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

NAT: automatic vs. manual mappings #106

fichtner opened this issue Mar 25, 2015 · 4 comments
Assignees
@8191
Labels
feature Adding new functionality
Milestone
16.1

Comments

@fichtner
Copy link
Member

"Well, either Automatic doesn't show the manual mapping a at all, but perhaps "remembers" them when coming from Manual, or do allow the manual mapping's to be used before the automatically generated ones. (With an option to enable/disable them)"

via https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=229.msg931#msg931
@fichtner fichtner added feature Adding new functionality help wanted Contributor missing / timeout labels Jul 1, 2015
@fichtner fichtner added this to the 16.1 milestone Jul 1, 2015
@fichtner fichtner closed this as completed Jan 9, 2016
@8191
Copy link
Member

8191 commented Jan 9, 2016

@fichtner Was this closed intentionally? Currently I still can see the manual rules when using automatic outbound NAT.

@fichtner
Copy link
Member Author

fichtner commented Jan 9, 2016

No activity for too long so I closed it, but if you take this I can reopen?

@8191
Copy link
Member

8191 commented Jan 9, 2016

Sure, I'll take it.

@8191 8191 mentioned this issue Jan 10, 2016
Closed
@fichtner fichtner removed the help wanted Contributor missing / timeout label Jan 10, 2016
@fichtner
Copy link
Member Author

thank you :)

@fichtner fichtner reopened this Jan 10, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@8191 8191

Labels
feature Adding new functionality
Milestone
16.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@fichtner @8191