Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Captive Portal: users should be configured and enabled in the CP Screen #132

Closed
jstrebel opened this issue Apr 9, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Captive Portal: users should be configured and enabled in the CP Screen #132

jstrebel opened this issue Apr 9, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees
@AdSchellevis
Labels
feature Adding new functionality
Milestone
16.1

Comments

@jstrebel
Copy link

jstrebel commented Apr 9, 2015

Currently we need to configure the user and their password in the System:User Manager. I suggest to configure the CP users in the CP screen. Those users have in my view nothing in common with the Users in the "User Manger.
In M0n0wall this type of user are configured in the CP pave
Regards Jakob
@fichtner
Copy link
Member

fichtner commented Apr 9, 2015

Hi Jakob, I agree with this. We have the same issue in the VPN functionality. I'll pick this up, but it'll take a bit of time to materialise.

@fichtner fichtner added feature Adding new functionality help wanted Contributor missing / timeout labels Apr 9, 2015
@fichtner fichtner added this to the 15.7 milestone Apr 9, 2015
@fichtner fichtner self-assigned this Apr 9, 2015
@fichtner fichtner mentioned this issue May 7, 2015
Closed
@fichtner fichtner modified the milestones: 16.1, 15.7 Jul 1, 2015
@fichtner fichtner removed the help wanted Contributor missing / timeout label Oct 18, 2015
@fichtner fichtner assigned AdSchellevis and unassigned fichtner Oct 18, 2015
@fichtner
Copy link
Member

Reassigned to the portal master. ;)

@AdSchellevis
Copy link
Member

For voucher type users I agree and the new version does implement voucher users in a separate screen. Within the normal access control, it does make sense to handle them shared. captive portal is a service in this case, just like ipsec is for example.

Can we close this one?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@AdSchellevis AdSchellevis

Labels
feature Adding new functionality
Milestone
16.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@fichtner @jstrebel @AdSchellevis