Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

default /var MFS can be too small for updates #243

Closed
fichtner opened this issue Jul 8, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

default /var MFS can be too small for updates #243

fichtner opened this issue Jul 8, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature Adding new functionality
Milestone

Comments

@fichtner
Copy link
Member

fichtner commented Jul 8, 2015

Move /tmp and /var MFS to tmpfs so that we don't have to specify upper memory bounds anymore.

@fichtner fichtner added the feature Adding new functionality label Jul 8, 2015
@fichtner fichtner self-assigned this Jul 8, 2015
@fichtner fichtner added this to the 16.1 milestone Jul 8, 2015
@fichtner fichtner changed the title default /var MFS size is too small for larger updates default /var MFS can be too small for updates Jul 8, 2015
fichtner added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2015
Remove the size settings for those mount points as a preparation,
because tmpfs does not need an upper bound.  Hardcode everything
now, replace mfs with tmpfs in an upcoming commit.
fichtner added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2015
@fichtner
Copy link
Member Author

fichtner commented Jul 9, 2015

squid doesn't run / can't write into log with this -- I wonder if the old code had the same issue?

@fichtner fichtner reopened this Jul 9, 2015
fichtner added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2015
Remove the size settings for those mount points as a preparation,
because tmpfs does not need an upper bound.  Hardcode everything
now, replace mfs with tmpfs in an upcoming commit.
fichtner added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2015
fichtner added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2015
@fichtner
Copy link
Member Author

Shipped!!1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Adding new functionality
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant