-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 647
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
net/haproxy: release 2.8 #772
Conversation
With seamless reloads enabled$ ab -r -c 10 -n100000 http://opnsense-haproxy-test/ Without seamless reloads$ ab -r -c 10 -n100000 http://opnsense-haproxy-test/ |
|
I've submitted a patch for the FreeBSD port, because the seamless reload feature requires a small modification to the RC script: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This requires HAProxy 1.8.13? Is the FreeBSD modification already included or do we need to pull this into our tree as well?
|
@fichtner, HAProxy 1.8.13 is recommended because it fixes a related bug. The FreeBSD modifications are not yet included, we need to pull this into our tree or wait until it gets committed upstream. |
|
Let‘s wait for FreeBSD to not risk changing it twice here erst case. Do you have the PR link over at FreeBSD?
… On 3. Aug 2018, at 23:17, Frank Wall ***@***.***> wrote:
@fichtner, HAProxy 1.8.13 is recommended because it fixes a related bug. The FreeBSD modifications are not yet included, we need to pull this into our tree or wait until it gets committed upstream.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
a803b48
to
fc8353f
Compare
|
@fichtner The upstream patch was commited in the FreeBSD ports tree. I'll merge this now, please pull in the required pieces in the ports repo too. :) |
|
Ack. Will do when I’m back in September. Thanks for the FreeBSD submission 😊 |
|
FYI 697c98b8 -- we're all good so 2.8 will be in 18.7.2. Thanks! |
|
are there plans to import existing haproxy configs? |
|
@bott0r Please open a new issue for unrelated requests. |
New features
Bugfixes
Enhancements