Confusing Enterprise Billing Policies #198518
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We're seeing the same thing. The universal budget effectively becomes a hard cap, which makes separate funding allocations pointless. We have users who have additional approved spend available through their own cost centres, but once they hit the universal limit they're blocked anyway. That leaves us with a choice between removing the universal protection entirely or manually managing exceptions user by user. Neither is practical. The current model seems to assume every user draws from a single budget pool. That's not how a lot of enterprises operate. Different teams, projects and departments often have their own funding and approval processes. At the very least, budgets need some form of hierarchy or precedence so that additional approved funding can actually be used instead of being blocked by the global limit. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Discussion Type
Bug
💬 Feature/Topic Area
Copilot in GitHub
Body
We have enacted a universal user budget. This is working. Ish. In the short term we will make do. However, I also have independent credit funding for certain groups of users that I need to allocate. Previously, I'd put this into a cost centre and assigned those users that had access to additional funding. Now, the universal user budget blocks said users from accessing their additional funding. I can't remove them from the universal budget for obvious reasons. Which means they cannot have access to their funding that they have secured for more copilot spend. You're literally shooting yourself in the foot here.
Also, tiered user group budgets as a whole is so necessary. Come on. Please. This is a nightmare for administration right now. I have to manually assign each user who needs to go above the universal budget.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions