Adding containers to the SCF that depend on overlap when building the potential. #132
pitsteinbach
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey,
I am planning to add Mulliken approximated exchange to tblite as an interaction, however the current formulation is dependent on the overlap, whereas interaction containers aren't in the current state.
Some new tight-binding methods planned to be implemented here, will use this exchange type and maybe future interaction will do as well.
Should we add an optional variable to the interaction container? Any other ideas?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions