diff --git a/content/2023/01/2023-01-26-using-multiple-vl53l-type-sensors.md b/content/2023/01/2023-01-26-using-multiple-vl53l-type-sensors.md
index 3a5e006c..0836b530 100644
--- a/content/2023/01/2023-01-26-using-multiple-vl53l-type-sensors.md
+++ b/content/2023/01/2023-01-26-using-multiple-vl53l-type-sensors.md
@@ -22,7 +22,10 @@ They are small compared with the HC-SR04 distance sensors, and faster being base
 The devices connect via I2C, and I2C normally allows multiple devices to share a bus, keeping pin usage low. However, one common problem for the VL53 series is that they all come with a single preprogrammed I2C address. Lets see some solutions for this.
 
 <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/XQrxPcq2tZ8" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share"allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>
-</div>
+
+## Getting a single sensor working
+
+If you are yet to get one of these working, I suggest taking a look at [Raspberry Pi Pico & VL53L0X for MicroPython](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBu6GKnN4lk) where Kevin McAleer explains how to get one of these working with a Raspberry Pi Pico.
 
 ## Simple solution - 2 I2C buses