New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spuriousness "Missing way on level crossing" warnings #1327
Comments
|
Here I was about to add a ticket for railway=disused but the issue seem to be more generic. crossing are for pedestrians, level_crossing for vehicles. |
|
Thanks for your answers. I will mark these as false positives in OSMOSE. |
|
Those false positives crop up in the Netherlands, too. I came across this example: I gather from the error message that it finds the corresponding highway=unclasified OK, but it doesn't appear to find the railway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396695648 (although the offending node is part of it) I hope this helps debugging. |

I see quite some "Missing way on level crossing" warnings but I do not see what is wrong, the node is on a crossing between a way marked as highway=* and railway=*
For examples and further details see:
Or use http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=7090&zoom=7&lat=51.113&lon=4.883&level=2&tags=&fixable= to find more examples.
I had a look at https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/master/analysers/analyser_osmosis_highway_features.py but it is not clear to me where things go wrong.
Does this have anything to do with #1216?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: