Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Emissions restriction #16218

Open
Almorca opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Emissions restriction #16218

Almorca opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning
Milestone

Comments

@Almorca
Copy link

Almorca commented Jan 12, 2023

The number of low-emission zones where vehicles are restricted according to their pollution levels is increasing daily.

In OSM there are examples like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7966961

It's common to use a motor_vehicle:conditional tag with vale no @ (emissions < euro_5 )

It would be useful if, just as osmand already monitors weight and length restrictions, it could also take into account the European Emission standars ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_emission_standards ).

@vshcherb vshcherb added this to the next-backend milestone Jan 13, 2023
@vshcherb
Copy link
Member

We need to display if route enters emission zone restriction so people could choose to avoid

@Kovoschiz
Copy link
Contributor

Kovoschiz commented Jan 19, 2023

That's not accurate. It needs to be eg toll:conditional=yes @ (*) as they are allowed by paying, or purchasing a pass. https://www.slimnaarantwerpen.be/en/LEZ/check-your-vehicle/conditions-for-admission-as-of-1/1/2020
As the tagging in general isn't clear (eg when only certain pollutants are restricted), warning for the boundary= alone will be enough at first.

@Zweitaktmotor
Copy link

Yes, boundary would be good, but also an option to avoid/calculate alternative routes.

Sorry, I don't know much about the programming behind it and apprreciate all the volunteer efforts.

@Zirochkabila Zirochkabila added the Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning label Jan 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants