Remove repair steps for broken updater repair #24438

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 12, 2016

Projects

None yet

6 participants

@LukasReschke
Member
LukasReschke commented May 4, 2016 edited

That's only required for an update to 9.0.2 (for newer updates not, this just removes the code), the updater server has the required logic to ensure that clients get the right update delivered.

cc @PVince81 @DeepDiver1975 @VicDeo
cc @karlitschek Please approve backport.

@LukasReschke LukasReschke Remove repair steps for broken updater repair
That's only required for an update to 9.0.2, the updater server has the required logic to ensure that clients get the right update delivered.
58ed5b9
@LukasReschke LukasReschke added this to the 9.0.3-next-maintenance milestone May 4, 2016
@mention-bot

By analyzing the blame information on this pull request, we identified @PVince81, @DeepDiver1975 and @nickvergessen to be potential reviewers

@nickvergessen
Contributor

👍

@karlitschek
Member

great. 👍 as discussed. please backport

@DeepDiver1975 DeepDiver1975 merged commit 283347a into stable9 May 12, 2016

21 of 22 checks passed

ocs-api-integration-tests-ci Build #10421 failed in 16 min
Details
cla-bot-core Build #3800 succeeded in 7 min 47 sec
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
core-ci-linux-jsunit/database=sqlite,label=SLAVE Build #61616 succeeded in 1 hr 23 min
Details
core-ci-linux-swift-primary-storage/database=mysql,label=SLAVE Build #55831 succeeded in 1 hr 24 min
Details
core-ci-linux/database=mysql,label=SLAVE Build #30278 succeeded in 1 hr 23 min
Details
core-ci-linux/database=oci,label=SLAVE Build #30278 succeeded in 1 hr 52 min
Details
core-ci-linux/database=pgsql,label=SLAVE Build #30278 succeeded in 1 hr 23 min
Details
core-ci-linux/database=sqlite,label=SLAVE Build #30278 succeeded in 58 min
Details
server-master-linux-externals-ci/database=sqlite,external=smb-silvershell,label=SLAVE Build #10026 succeeded in 23 min
Details
server-master-linux-externals-ci/database=sqlite,external=swift-ceph,label=SLAVE Build #10026 succeeded in 21 min
Details
server-master-linux-externals-ci/database=sqlite,external=webdav-ownCloud,label=SLAVE Build #10026 succeeded in 25 min
Details
server-master-linux-externals-smb-windows-ext-ci/database=sqlite,external=smb-windows,label=master Build #14055 succeeded in 2 min 10 sec
Details
server-master-linux-php5.4-ci/database=sqlite,label=SLAVE Build #3298 succeeded in 30 min
Details
server-master-linux-php7-ci/database=sqlite,label=SLAVE Build #38560 succeeded in 27 min
Details
smashbox-on-docker-ci/DOCKER_IMAGE=ubuntu_oc_lamp-git,TEST_NAME=litmus,mirallBranch=v2.0.2,slave=SMASH Build #14396 succeeded in 5 min 50 sec
Details
smashbox-on-docker-ci/DOCKER_IMAGE=ubuntu_oc_lamp-git,TEST_NAME=test_basicSync@0,mirallBranch=v2.0.2,slave=SMASH Build #14396 succeeded in 13 min
Details
smashbox-on-docker-ci/DOCKER_IMAGE=ubuntu_oc_lamp-git,TEST_NAME=test_basicSync@1,mirallBranch=v2.0.2,slave=SMASH Build #14396 succeeded in 27 min
Details
smashbox-on-docker-ci/DOCKER_IMAGE=ubuntu_oc_lamp-git,TEST_NAME=test_shareLink,mirallBranch=v2.0.2,slave=SMASH Build #14396 succeeded in 33 min
Details
smashbox-on-docker-ci/DOCKER_IMAGE=ubuntu_oc_lamp-git,TEST_NAME=test_sharePermissions,mirallBranch=v2.0.2,slave=SMASH Build #14396 succeeded in 25 min
Details
smashbox-on-docker-ci/DOCKER_IMAGE=ubuntu_oc_lamp-git,TEST_NAME=test_sharePropagationGroups,mirallBranch=v2.0.2,slave=SMASH Build #14396 succeeded in 8 min 34 sec
Details
smashbox-on-docker-ci/DOCKER_IMAGE=ubuntu_oc_lamp-git,TEST_NAME=test_sharePropagationInsideGroups,mirallBranch=v2.0.2,slave=SMASH Build #14396 succeeded in 11 min
Details
@DeepDiver1975 DeepDiver1975 deleted the stable9-revert-updater-workarounds branch May 12, 2016
@PVince81 PVince81 referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2016
Merged

Revert "Remove repair steps for broken updater repair" #25343

0 of 1 task complete
@PVince81
Collaborator
PVince81 commented Jul 4, 2016

Reverted since we can't make encryption users go through 9.0.2 when updating: #25343

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment