-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
fix permission bits when enforcing rw links #40701
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thanks for opening this pull request! The maintainers of this repository would appreciate it if you would create a changelog item based on your changes. |
💥 Acceptance tests pipeline webUISettingsMenu-chrome-mariadb10.2-php7.4 failed. The build has been cancelled. |
I restarted CI. At least one of the pipelines had a problem fetching its docker images. It should run soon, after the various nightly pipelines are finished and there are docker agents available. |
https://drone.owncloud.com/owncloud/core/38138/9/7
|
This will probably also need changelog. |
@jnweiger let me also review this, just to make sure it wont introduce some more regressions that are not covered with enough tests. |
@mrow4a CI is now happy. Review it? |
@jnweiger @pako81 ok, so the logic must match both server side and client side: Also we need to make sure all cases are covered (both folder and file). I will add commits to this change. |
@mrow4a you can see in the initial post, 'How Has This Been Tested' what I tested. |
it works, because this checks what should NOT require password. I am also investigation whether something else should be considered. |
821835a
to
9d95f72
Compare
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
@mrow4a Thank you! That is much cleaner now: Better and consistent naming, js and php "obviously" do the same logic now. All cases explicit (that always puzzled me). |
Tested all my combinations from the initial comment, and a few more. We now have: I'd argue that controlling this case with the setting [x] Enforce password protection for read + write links Everything else works as expected. |
@jnweiger so one detail, for the shares on a file, delete permission is always there. As you can delete a share which is basically unmount. I understand this is confusing, but it is as is. |
Ah, understand. Deleting the share is a permission. Well, that is not exactly deleting the file. But makes sense from an end user perspective. |
Description
The bits READ UPDATE CREATE DELETE are used to differentiate the differnrt types of shares.
passwordMustBeEnforced() maps these bits to the read-only, read-write, read-write-delete, write-only settings.
This code is used for both, files and foldes. with files, the logic was wrong, in such a way, that no setting would enforce passwords on a Download/View/Edit type file share.
Related Issue
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
keyboard + hands + eyes
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Types of changes
Checklist: