-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 460
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated Copyright Headers #276
Conversation
I'm not convinced this is necessary, but it's probably not worth investigating. |
Updated Copyright Headers
😃 |
only the first publish year is needed |
@wouterj. I've seen both used. It's really personal preference. I can change it to whatever @davedevelopment wants? |
It's done now, no point bikeshedding :) |
That's why I don't like to put any time-based information (e.g. year) in license code, that is placed in each library's file. For example: https://github.com/aik099/qa-tools/blob/master/library/aik099/QATools/PageObject/How.php |
@aik099 for a valid copyright notice, you need to include the year of the first release in it. |
No way, first time I'm hearing about this. A lot of projects on GitHub don't have a year in it. Any reference I can read about it? |
Yes, but if you are to look at other popular repos, they don't do this. Take Twitter Bootstrap for example: https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap#copyright-and-license. |
They do this: https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/js/affix.js So should I convert |
Updated for 2010-2014. I've also fixed a few occurrences where a link to the wrong project was included.