Updated Copyright Headers

[GrahamCampbell]

Updated for 2010-2014. I've also fixed a few occurrences where a link to the wrong project was included.

[davedevelopment]

I'm not convinced this is necessary, but it's probably not worth investigating.

[GrahamCampbell]

😃

[wouterj]

only the first publish year is needed

[GrahamCampbell]

@wouterj. I've seen both used. It's really personal preference. I can change it to whatever @davedevelopment wants?

[davedevelopment]

It's done now, no point bikeshedding :)

[aik099]

That's why I don't like to put any time-based information (e.g. year) in license code, that is placed in each library's file. For example: https://github.com/aik099/qa-tools/blob/master/library/aik099/QATools/PageObject/How.php

[wouterj]

@aik099 for a valid copyright notice, you need to include the year of the first release in it.

[aik099]

No way, first time I'm hearing about this. A lot of projects on GitHub don't have a year in it. Any reference I can read about it?

[wouterj]

@aik099 http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf page 4

[GrahamCampbell]

Yes, but if you are to look at other popular repos, they don't do this. Take Twitter Bootstrap for example: https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap#copyright-and-license.

[aik099]

Yes, but if you are to look at other popular repos, they don't do this. Take Twitter Bootstrap for example:

They do this: https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/js/affix.js

@aik099 http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf page 4

So should I convert @copyright Alexander Obuhovich <aik.bold@gmail.com> into @copyright 2013 Alexander Obuhovich <aik.bold@gmail.com> in each file's DocBlock?