Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Werkzeug on Unix Domain Sockets #209

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@runderwood
Copy link

commented Aug 8, 2012

I patched Werkzeug's WSGI server to be capable of binding to Unix domain sockets.

@untitaker

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Dec 4, 2012

I don't see a good use case for this since production servers like gunicorn already do that, and you usually don't need it in dev. However, these changes are not too big, so I'd just merge them.

@runderwood

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

commented Dec 16, 2012

I've found it quite useful for shared development environments, but I don't disagree that it's a somewhat unusual use case.

@untitaker untitaker force-pushed the pallets:master branch 2 times, most recently from 8377106 to 1842d71 Aug 25, 2014

@untitaker

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Aug 31, 2014

@runderwood Are you still interested in this?

@runderwood

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

commented Aug 31, 2014

I don't have a pressing need for it now, but I found it useful at the time.

@untitaker

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Aug 31, 2014

Then i'd rather close this, as you've been the only one since then who asked for this feature.

@untitaker untitaker closed this Aug 31, 2014

@dajose

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Oct 13, 2016

can we reopen this? This feature can be handy on my project too @untitaker

@untitaker

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Oct 13, 2016

Please file a PR if you want this feature implemented in Werkzeug.

@dajose

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Oct 13, 2016

Thanks :) we'll look if @runderwood solution is still working after these years and open a new PR

@davidism

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Oct 13, 2016

You can use the instructions here to pull this PR into your own clone: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

@sergiosmcr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Oct 14, 2016

I am working with @dajose, @untitaker please check PR #1019

@davidism davidism added this to the 0.15 milestone May 29, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.