Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Werkzeug on Unix Domain Sockets #209

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

@runderwood
Copy link

@runderwood runderwood commented Aug 8, 2012

I patched Werkzeug's WSGI server to be capable of binding to Unix domain sockets.

@untitaker
Copy link
Member

@untitaker untitaker commented Dec 4, 2012

I don't see a good use case for this since production servers like gunicorn already do that, and you usually don't need it in dev. However, these changes are not too big, so I'd just merge them.

@runderwood
Copy link
Author

@runderwood runderwood commented Dec 16, 2012

I've found it quite useful for shared development environments, but I don't disagree that it's a somewhat unusual use case.

@untitaker untitaker force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 8377106 to 1842d71 Aug 31, 2014
@untitaker
Copy link
Member

@untitaker untitaker commented Aug 31, 2014

@runderwood Are you still interested in this?

@runderwood
Copy link
Author

@runderwood runderwood commented Aug 31, 2014

I don't have a pressing need for it now, but I found it useful at the time.

@untitaker
Copy link
Member

@untitaker untitaker commented Aug 31, 2014

Then i'd rather close this, as you've been the only one since then who asked for this feature.

@untitaker untitaker closed this Aug 31, 2014
@dajose
Copy link

@dajose dajose commented Oct 13, 2016

can we reopen this? This feature can be handy on my project too @untitaker

@untitaker
Copy link
Member

@untitaker untitaker commented Oct 13, 2016

Please file a PR if you want this feature implemented in Werkzeug.

@dajose
Copy link

@dajose dajose commented Oct 13, 2016

Thanks :) we'll look if @runderwood solution is still working after these years and open a new PR

@davidism
Copy link
Member

@davidism davidism commented Oct 13, 2016

You can use the instructions here to pull this PR into your own clone: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

@sergiosmcr
Copy link
Contributor

@sergiosmcr sergiosmcr commented Oct 14, 2016

I am working with @dajose, @untitaker please check PR #1019

@davidism davidism added this to the 0.15 milestone May 29, 2018
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 13, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants