Skip to content

Conversation

@boblehest
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@untitaker
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM but please add tests.

@boblehest
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry about that, I forgot to read your contribution guidelines.

@untitaker untitaker self-assigned this Apr 10, 2016
@untitaker
Copy link
Contributor

I'm no longer sure this is a good idea. @mitsuhiko?

@untitaker untitaker assigned mitsuhiko and unassigned untitaker Apr 10, 2016
@davidism
Copy link
Member

Closing due to age and no description of what the issue was. Please open a new ticket to discuss if you still need this.

@davidism davidism closed this May 22, 2018
@davidism
Copy link
Member

Oops, found the explanation in #693, but looks like your branch doesn't exist anymore so I can't reopen the PR. The last comment there says the latest RFC supports this, so I think this is reasonable. I'll cherry-pick this.

@davidism davidism added this to the 0.15 milestone May 28, 2018
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 13, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants